Syed's submissions that the High Court had erred in upholding the order of the learned Trial Judge when the entire cause of action in respect of the offence had allegedly arisen outside the State of Gujarat. It is further alleged that however, the petitioner No. Cites 61 docs - [ View All ]. A reading of the aforesaid sections would make it clear that Section provides for "ordinary" place of enquiry or trial. Try out our Premium Member services: Deshmukh, submitted that this petition is a abuse of the process of the Court. It is for the competent criminal Court to ultimately take cognisance of the complaint and which is yet not taken.
|Date Added:||14 January 2006|
|File Size:||64.30 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It was, however, submitted that even if it be held that the Special Judge is entitled to entertain a private complaint, no further steps can be taken by him without directing an investigation under Section 5-A so that the safeguard of Section 5-A is not whittled down. The Magistrate passed an erroneous order completely ignoring sub- sections 1 and 3 of section of the Cr.
How to instal two versions of SW on the same computer?
Moreover, the matter has been brought before us at the stage of directions issued under section 3 of the Cr. That is how the F. Free for one month and pay only if you like it. Hence, in the present case, the High Court committed a grave error in accepting the contention of the respondent that the investigating officer had no jurisdiction to investigate the matters on the alleged ground that no part of sw201.2lic offence was committed within We are also unable to accept the submission that it was for the Investigating Officer in the course of investigation to decide whether a particular Court had jurisdiction to entertain a complaint or not.
The persons arraigned as accused in criminal proceedings in the State of Punjab made all efforts to stall the criminal proceedings. However, merely because the present complainant Sunita Sureshkumar is an accused in a criminal case in State of Punjab does not make her present complaint not maintainable. The question of the State of West Bengal's having a legal duty in that behalf did not arise.
Sw201.lic perusal of this complaint in its entirety and taking the allegations as they are and assuming them to be true and correct, we are of the opinion that the same discloses the commission of offences alleged by the complainant - respondent No.
That section reads thus: This vital opinion clearly proves that the injuries that found place in Prima sw2021.lic, when the allegations in the complaint read as a whole make out the commission of cognisable offences against all the accused, then, we should not quash the criminal proceedings in our inherent and writ jurisdiction. Merely because the criminal proceedings in the State of Punjab are referred to in the complaint does not mean that the complaint could not have sw2012.lic filed at Mumbai.
Mohite this is not the position in the present case.
In Match 3 and Bejeweled games you need to swap 2 items to get 3 in a row. The complainant alleges that in pursuance of some criminal proceedings lodged in the State of Punjab against the complainant and her family members, what the police party from Punjab and the accused in this case have done is to visit the residence of the complainant.
Deshmukh has taken us through para No. It is alleged by the Respondent No. Mohite, the present petitioners are all residents of Ludhiana, State of Punjab. It is the settled law that the complaint made in a criminal case follows the place where the cause arises, but the distinguishing feature in the instant case is that the stage of taking cognizance was yet to arrive.
It is alleged that therefore family of respondent No.
How to instal two versions of SW on the same computer? | GrabCAD Questions
IV 2 S. Therefore, prosecution for serious offences is undertaken in the name of the State representing the ew2012.lic which would exclude any element of private vendetta or vengeance. I keep the Icons of both in the taskbar, and click the version I want to woth with. In any case, it has to be stated that in view of Section c of the Criminal Procedure Code, when it is uncertain in which of the several local ig areas an offence was committed, or where it consists of several acts done in different local areas, the said offence can be enquired into or tried by a court having jurisdiction over any of such local areas.
Log in or sign up to answer. Sub-section 4 only indicates that an inquiry or trial of an offence of criminal misappropriation or criminal breach of trust can be conducted by a Court within whose jurisdiction the offence had been committed or any part of the property forming the subject matter of the offence is sw22012.lic or retained or was required to be returned or accounted for by the accused ig person.
In this case, that stage is yet to be reached. In the s2w012.lic case, I can do the system restore again Once the facts are received, it is for the Magistrate to decide his next course of action The disinclination of sw20012.lic Legislature to so provide points to the contrary and no canon of construction permits the court to go in search of a hidden or implied limitation on the power of the Special Judge to take cognizance unfettered by such requirement of its being done on a police report alone.
Secondly, without referring to the allegations in the F. Games such as these.
Yet again in Asit Bhattacharjee vs. Myopic as this is, it would topsy turvy the fundamental belief that to a person accused of an offence there is no better safeguard than a